Renewable energy

Iceland leads at 88.8% while economic giants like the US, Japan and South Korea languish in the bottom ten.

OECDUpdated Dec '25

Summary

Top 5 Renewable Energy Leaders

1Iceland
88.8 %
2Costa Rica
48.4 %
3Norway
46.5 %
4Brazil
45.8 %
5Latvia
40.6 %
Dataset Median
15.9 %

Bottom 5 Renewable Energy Leaders

43Australia
7 %
44Japan
6.3 %
45South Africa
4.2 %
46Israel
3.7 %
47South Korea
2 %

Gap

1.8x

Iceland leads by massive 1.8x margin

Outlier

7.76%

US lags at 41st place with 7.76%

Cluster

40%+

Five countries exceed 40% renewables

Data

47 results

1Iceland88.8 %
2Costa Rica48.4 %
3Norway46.5 %
4Brazil45.8 %
5Latvia40.6 %
6Sweden40.3 %
7New Zealand40.0 %
8Denmark35.5 %
9Finland34.9 %
10Austria30.1 %

Map

Renewable energy

2.0 %
88.8 %

Insights

Generated automatically using AI

Gap

1.8x

Iceland's 88.8% renewable share is 1.8x higher than second-place Costa Rica

Outlier

7.76%

US ranks 41st with just 7.76% renewable energy despite economic strength

Cluster

40%+

Five Nordic and small nations achieve 40%+ renewable energy shares

Gap

44.6x

Iceland's renewable share is 44.6x higher than bottom-ranked South Korea

Trailing

3 of 3

All three major Asian economies rank in bottom 10 for renewable energy

Methodology

This dataset is sourced from the OECD through its official SDMX data service.
Rankdat does not alter or model the underlying values — we only clean formats, standardize country names, and reshape the data for visualization.

OECD compiles these indicators from a mix of sources including national statistical offices, international household surveys (such as Gallup World Poll, EU-SILC, ISSP), and harmonised administrative datasets.
Each indicator follows the definitions and structure specified in the OECD’s Data Structure Definition (DSD) for this dataflow.

Because indicators originate from different countries and surveys, collection years, sampling methods, and questionnaire wording may vary. OECD applies harmonisation rules to improve comparability, but differences in national methodology may still affect cross-country comparisons.

Full definitions, data collection notes, and quality documentation are available through the OECD metadata portal linked in the Sources section.

Source