General government net financial worth

Norway's government wealth dwarfs all others while most major economies sink deep into the red.

OECDUpdated Dec '25

Summary

Top 5 Government Finances

1Norway
327.2 %
2Finland
62.9 %
3Luxembourg
55.4 %
4Sweden
36.4 %
5South Korea
36 %
Dataset Median
-27.9 %

Bottom 5 Government Finances

34Belgium
-86.2 %
35Portugal
-98.9 %
36Japan
-125.6 %
37Italy
-126.5 %
38Greece
-146.2 %

Gap

5.3x

Norway leads Finland by 5.3x in wealth

Trend

10 of 38

Just 10 of 38 countries have positive wealth

Leader

4 of 5

Nordic nations dominate top 5 rankings

Data

38 results

1Norway327.2 %
2Finland62.9 %
3Luxembourg55.4 %
4Sweden36.4 %
5South Korea36.0 %
6New Zealand21.8 %
7Estonia19.9 %
8Switzerland18.2 %
9Australia8.3 %
10Denmark5.5 %

Map

General government net financial worth

-146.2 %
327.2 %

Insights

Generated automatically using AI

Gap

5.3x

Norway's government wealth exceeds Finland's by over 5x, the second richest

Trend

10 of 38

Only 10 of 38 developed nations have positive government net worth

Leader

4 of 5

Nordic countries claim 4 of the top 5 spots in government wealth

Outlier

#5

South Korea breaks Nordic dominance as the sole Asian nation in top 10

Gap

-146.2%

Greece sits at the bottom with net worth at negative 146% of GDP

Methodology

This dataset is sourced from the OECD through its official SDMX data service.
Rankdat does not alter or model the underlying values — we only clean formats, standardize country names, and reshape the data for visualization.

OECD compiles these indicators from a mix of sources including national statistical offices, international household surveys (such as Gallup World Poll, EU-SILC, ISSP), and harmonised administrative datasets.
Each indicator follows the definitions and structure specified in the OECD’s Data Structure Definition (DSD) for this dataflow.

Because indicators originate from different countries and surveys, collection years, sampling methods, and questionnaire wording may vary. OECD applies harmonisation rules to improve comparability, but differences in national methodology may still affect cross-country comparisons.

Full definitions, data collection notes, and quality documentation are available through the OECD metadata portal linked in the Sources section.

Source